
Think Twice Before Going Cheap on Your Skin
Cheap products often come with hidden costs that hurt the consumer in the long run, especially when it comes to something as important as your skin. Finding a quality laser skin treatment can be expensive, but you don’t have to go too far out of your way to find a great deal. If you’re on the hunt for the best laser skin treatment, consider the quality over price before you commit to any one provider.
The biggest issues with cheap lasers
With cheap lasers, you’re likely to get a treatment that is only marginally effective. The downside to that? You’ll probably have to get multiple treatments, which will drive up your cost. Furthermore, in some cases, these cheap treatments can actually leave you worse off than before.
The two quality tiers of lasers
One of your best defenses against laser regret is understanding where a clinic fits in terms of quality. The two basic tiers are FDA-approved and non-FDA approved. The non-FDA versions often provide more treatments at once, but they also carry a greater risk of burns, scarring and other side effects. Always go with an FDA-approved provider; it’s worth paying a little more for peace of mind and safety.
What to look for in a clinic
There are lots of things to look for in a clinic before deciding whether or not to have laser skin resurfacing done. These include: — Where is your clinic located? A reputable clinic should be in a central location with parking close by, and staffed by experienced, educated, caring professionals. — What kind of lasers does your clinic use? The best clinics will use state-of-the-art laser technology that provides optimal results with minimal side effects.
Don’t fall victim to too good to be true promotions
Be wary of promotions promising cheap laser skin treatments—there’s usually a reason they are so affordable. The FDA doesn’t regulate many low-cost cosmetic lasers, so you may be getting something that is not quite up to standard or made with lower quality materials. If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
?>